MicroVision, Inc. :MVIS-US: Earnings Analysis: Q2, 2016 By the Numbers : August 11, 2016

MicroVision, Inc. reports financial results for the quarter ended June 30, 2016.

We analyze the earnings along side the following peers of MicroVision, Inc. – Qorvo, Inc., Micron Technology, Inc., Texas Instruments Incorporated, Video Display Corporation and IntriCon Corporation (QRVO-US, MU-US, TXN-US, VIDE-US and IIN-US) that have also reported for this period.


  • Summary numbers: Revenues of USD 4.16 million, Net Earnings of USD -3.48 million.
  • Gross margins widened from 29.36% to 37.62% compared to the same period last year, operating (EBITDA) margins now -78.12% from -65.32%.
  • Year-on-year change in operating cash flow of -14.68% is about the same as the change in earnings, likely no significant movement in accruals or reserves.
  • Narrowing of operating margins contributed to decline in earnings.

The table below shows the preliminary results and recent trends for key metrics such as revenues and net income growth:

2015-06-30 2015-09-30 2015-12-31 2016-03-31 2016-06-30
Relevant Numbers (Quarterly)
Revenues (mil) 4.04 2.4 1.85 3.7 4.16
Revenue Growth (%YOY) 561.7 147.73 168.7 310.77 2.77
Earnings (mil) -2.77 -3.51 -4.3 -3.56 -3.48
Earnings Growth (%YOY) 18.58 -4.71 -28.45 10.25 -25.53
Net Margin (%) -68.49 -146.5 -232.83 -96.08 -83.66
EPS -0.06 -0.07 -0.09 -0.07 -0.07
Return on Equity (%) -169.83 -283.22 -1076.86 -1051.68 -937.56
Return on Assets (%) -54.39 -78.69 -116.24 -93.13 -92.43

Access our Ratings and Scores for MicroVision, Inc.

Market Share Versus Profits

Revenues History
Earnings History

MVIS-US‘s change in revenue this period compared to the same period last year of 2.77% is almost the same as its change in earnings, and is about average among the announced results thus far in its peer group, suggesting that MVIS-US is holding onto its market share. Also, for comparison purposes, revenues changed by 12.27% and earnings by 2.25% compared to the immediate last period.

Revenues Growth Versus Earnings Growth

Earnings Growth Analysis

The company’s earnings declined year-on-year largely because of the increases in operating costs. Its operating margins (EBITDA margins) went from -65.32% to -78.12%. This decline in earnings would have been worse except for the fact that the company showed improvement in gross margins, from 29.36% to 37.62%. For comparison, gross margins were 33.34% and EBITDA margins -90.08% in the immediate last period.

Gross Margin Versus EBITDA Margin

Gross Margin Trend

Companies sometimes sacrifice improvements in revenues and margins in order to extend friendlier terms to customers and vendors. Capital Cube probes for such activity by comparing the changes in gross margins with any changes in working capital. If the gross margins improved without a worsening of working capital, it is possible that the company’s performance is a result of truly delivering in the marketplace and not simply an accounting prop-up using the balance sheet.

Gross Margin History
Working Capital Days History

MVIS-US‘s improvement in gross margin has been accompanied by an improvement in its balance sheet as well. This suggests that gross margin improvements are likely from operating decisions and not accounting gimmicks. Its working capital days have declined to 106.56 days from 249.49 days for the same period last year.

Gross Margin Versus Working Capital Days

Cash Versus Earnings – Sustainable Performance?

MVIS-US‘s change in operating cash flow of -14.68% compared to the same period last year is about the same as its change in earnings this period. Additionally, this change in operating cash flow is about average among its peer group. This suggests that the company did not use accruals or reserves to manage earnings this period, and that, all else being equal, the earnings number is sustainable.

Operating Cash Flow Growth Versus Earnings Growth


The company’s decline in earnings has been influenced by the following factors: (1) Decline in operating margins (EBIT margins) from -68.51% to -83.92% and (2) one-time items that contributed to a decrease in pretax margins from -68.49% to -83.66%

EBIT Margin Versus PreTax Margin
EBIT Margin History
PreTax Margin History

Access our Ratings and Scores for MicroVision, Inc.

Company Profile

MicroVision, Inc. is the creator of PicoP scanning technology, an ultra-miniature laser projection and sensing solution based on the laser beam scanning methodology pioneered by the company. MicroVision’s platform approach for this advanced display and sensing solution means that it can be adapted to a wide array of applications and form factors. The company was founded in May 1993 and is headquartered in Redmond, WA.

CapitalCube does not own any shares in the stocks mentioned and focuses solely on providing unique fundamental research and analysis on approximately 50,000 stocks and ETFs globally. Try any of our analysis, screener or portfolio premium services free for 7 days. To get a quick preview of our services, check out our free quick summary analysis of MVIS-US.