Taylor Devices, Inc. :TAYD-US: Earnings Analysis: Q4, 2017 By the Numbers : September 1, 2017

Taylor Devices, Inc. reports financial results for the quarter ended May 31, 2017.

We analyze the earnings along side the following peers of Taylor Devices, Inc. – Ducommun Incorporated, Nordson Corporation, United Technologies Corporation and Astec Industries, Inc. (DCO-US, NDSN-US, UTX-US and ASTE-US) that have also reported for this period.

Highlights

  • Summary numbers: Revenues of USD 6.30 million, Net Earnings of USD 0.84 million.
  • Gross margins widened from 30.36% to 34.09% compared to the same period last year, operating (EBITDA) margins now 15.83% from 14.48%.
  • Year-on-year change in operating cash flow of 153.71% is about the same as the change in earnings, likely no significant movement in accruals or reserves.
  • Earnings decline largely a result of non-operational activity, pretax margins improved from 12.32% to 13.22%.

The table below shows the preliminary results and recent trends for key metrics such as revenues and net income growth:

2017-05-31 2017-02-28 2016-11-30 2016-08-31 2016-05-31
Relevant Numbers (Quarterly)
Revenues (mil) 6.3 5.67 7.81 5.76 9.06
Revenue Growth (%YOY) -30.46 -31.87 -11.48 -39.24 -15.84
Earnings (mil) 0.84 0.34 0.94 0.21 1.09
Earnings Growth (%YOY) -22.71 -71.38 1.47 -79.22 23.21
Net Margin (%) 13.4 5.96 12.02 3.65 12.05
EPS 0.23 0.1 0.27 0.06 0.32
Return on Equity (%) 2.61 1.07 3.02 0.69 3.7
Return on Assets (%) 9.07 3.61 10.14 2.27 11.79

Access our Ratings and Scores for Taylor Devices, Inc.

Market Share Versus Profits

Revenues History
Earnings History

TAYD-US‘s change in revenue this period compared to the same period last year of -30.46% is almost the same as its change in earnings, and is about average among the announced results thus far in its peer group, suggesting that TAYD-US is holding onto its market share. Also, for comparison purposes, revenues changed by 11.08% and earnings by 149.63% compared to the immediate last period.

Revenues Growth Versus Earnings Growth

Quadrant label definitions. Hover to know more

Leader, Earnings Focus, Laggard, Revenues Focus

Earnings Growth Analysis

The company’s year-on-year earnings decline did not come as a result of a contraction in gross margins or because of any cost control issues. Both gross margins and operating margins (EBITDA) margins actually improved over this time frame. Gross margins went from 30.36% to 34.09%, while operating margins improved from 14.48% to 15.83% over this period. For comparison, gross margins were 28.98% and EBITDA margins 12.33% in the immediate last period.

Gross Margin Versus EBITDA Margin

Quadrant label definitions. Hover to know more

Differentiated; Low Cost, Commodity; Low Cost, Commodity; High Cost, Differentiated; High Cost

Gross Margin Trend

Companies sometimes sacrifice improvements in revenues and margins in order to extend friendlier terms to customers and vendors. Capital Cube probes for such activity by comparing the changes in gross margins with any changes in working capital. If the gross margins improved without a worsening of working capital, it is possible that the company’s performance is a result of truly delivering in the marketplace and not simply an accounting prop-up using the balance sheet.

Gross Margin History
Working Capital Days History

TAYD-US‘s gross margin improvement has not produced any big difference in its working capital. Working capital days are currently 311.62, compared to last year’s level of 207.56 days. This leads Capital Cube to conclude that the improvements in gross margins are likely from operating decisions and not trade-offs with the balance sheet.

Gross Margin Versus Working Capital Days

Quadrant label definitions. Hover to know more

Customer Financed, Cash Starved, Supplier Financed, Cash Rich

Cash Versus Earnings – Sustainable Performance?

It is important to examine a company�s cash versus earnings numbers to gauge whether its performance is sustainable.

TAYD-US‘s change in operating cash flow of 153.71% compared to the same period last year is about the same as its change in earnings this period. Additionally, this change in operating cash flow is about average among its peer group. This suggests that the company did not use accruals or reserves to manage earnings this period, and that, all else being equal, the earnings number is sustainable.

Operating Cash Flow Growth Versus Earnings Growth

Quadrant label definitions. Hover to know more

Cash Flow based Earnings, Likely Non-cash Earnings, Low Cash Flow Base, Likely Undeclared Earnings

Margins

The company’s earnings decline is largely a result of non-operational activity. As a matter of fact, the company showed increases in operating (EBIT) and pretax margins. EBIT margins improved from 12.26% to 12.96% and pretax margins widened from 12.32% to 13.22%.

EBIT Margin Versus PreTax Margin

Quadrant label definitions. Hover to know more

Operation driven Earnings, One-time Favorables, Low Earnings Base, One-time Unfavorables
EBIT Margin History
PreTax Margin History

Access our Ratings and Scores for Taylor Devices, Inc.

Company Profile

Taylor Devices, Inc. engages in the design, development, manufacture and marketing of shock absorption, rate control and energy storage devices for use in various types of vehicles, machinery, equipment and structures. Its products include seismic dampers, which are designed to ameliorate the effects of earthquake tremors on structures, and represent a substantial part of the business of the company; Fluidicshoks, which are small, extremely compact shock absorbers, produced in various sizes for primary use in the defense, aerospace and commercial industry; crane and industrial buffers, which are larger versions of the Fluidicshoks, produced in various sizes for industrial application on cranes, ships, container ships, railroad cars, truck docks, ladle and ingot cars, ore trolleys and car stops; self-adjusting shock absorbers, which include versions of Fluidicshoks and crane and industrial buffers, automatically adjust to different impact conditions, and are designed for high cycle application primarily in the heavy industry; liquid die springs, which are used as component parts of machinery and equipment used in the manufacture of tools and dies; and vibration dampers, which are used primarily by the aerospace and defense industries to control the response of electronics and optical systems subjected to air, ship, or spacecraft vibration. The company was founded by Paul H. Taylor on July 22, 1955 and is headquartered in North Tonawanda, NY.

CapitalCube does not own any shares in the stocks mentioned and focuses solely on providing unique fundamental research and analysis on approximately 50,000 stocks and ETFs globally. Try any of our analysis, screener or portfolio premium services free for 7 days. To get a quick preview of our services, check out our free quick summary analysis of TAYD-US.

Disclaimer

The information presented in this report has been obtained from sources deemed to be reliable, but AnalytixInsight does not make any representation about the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of this information. This report was produced by AnalytixInsight for informational purposes only and nothing contained herein should be construed as an offer to buy or sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any security or derivative instrument. This report is current only as of the date that it was published and the opinions, estimates, ratings and other information may change without notice or publication. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Prior to making an investment or other financial decision, please consult with your financial, legal and tax advisors. AnalytixInsight shall not be liable for any party’s use of this report. AnalytixInsight is not a broker-dealer and does not buy, sell, maintain a position, or make a market in any security referred to herein. One of the principal tenets for us at AnalytixInsight is that the best person to handle your finances is you. By your use of our services or by reading any of our reports, you’re agreeing that you bear responsibility for your own investment research and investment decisions. You also agree that AnalytixInsight, its directors, its employees, and its agents will not be liable for any investment decision made or action taken by you and others based on news, information, opinion, or any other material generated by us and/or published through our services. For a complete copy of our disclaimer, please visit our website www.analytixinsight.com.